With the application number 2018/6161 and dated June 28, 2022 Constitutional Court Decision has been published in the Official Gazette No. 32049 on December 20, 2022, it has been concluded that the right to effective remedy, which is a positive obligation that must be carried out and assumed by the public authorities, has been violated.

The applicant had applied to the relevant telecommunication company for internet data, log records, IMEI information, hot spot date information and IP numbers received jointly with other subscribers belonging to his telephone line and containing a certain date range to be given to himself, and the request was not accepted by the relevant company. In the suit filed thereon, the local court decided to dismiss the case from the procedure, no positive results have been obtained from the legal remedy applied.

With the application number 2018/16857 and dated 29.09.2022 Constitutional Court Decision has been published in the Official Gazette No. 32030 on 01.12.2022, it has been concluded that the obligation to protect of personal data is a positive obligation that should be undertaken by public authorities hasn’t been fulfilled.

The Constitutional Court examined the claim that the right to request the protection of personal data was violated since the investigation made on the complaint regarding the illegal recording of a non-public speech was not conducted in accordance with the positive obligations of the state.

Pursuant to duplicated Article 298 of Tax Procedure Law, the revaluation rate has been published in the Official Gazette numbered 32023 (In Turkish) and dated 24.11.2022. Revaluation rate announced in the rate of 122.93% (one hundred twenty two comma ninety three) for 2023.

Constitutional Court decides on the texture of personal messages of the employee.

The Constitutional Court Decision published on the Official Gazette dated November 15, 2022 and numbered 32014 included the concept of personal data.

Due to the insulting messages of the employee on the company phone about other colleagues, the employment contract was terminated by the employer with a valid reason. According to the employee's claim, the contents of the messages are personal data and were obtained unlawfully by the employer. According to the employer's claim, since it is a company phone, the messages of the employee on the company phone were obtained in accordance with the law, since the device was a company device.