Mevzuat Kategorileri
Hukuksal Düzenlemeler
Türkiye’de Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Kanunu, Sosyal Güvenlik Hukuku, Vergi Hukuku, İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Mevzuatı, Borçlar Hukuku, İş Hukuku, Ticaret Hukuku, Türk Parası Kıymetini Koruma Mevzuatı, Kambiyo Mevzuatı ve Vatandaşlık ve Göçmenlik Mevzuatı ile ilgili en güncel bilgilerin yer aldığı makalelere buradan ulaşabilirsiniz.
İkili Anlaşmalar
Türkiye ve diğer ülkeler arasında yapılan en güncel uluslararası ikili sosyal güvenlik ve vergi anlaşmalarının tarihlerine ve dokümanlarına buradan ulaşabilirsiniz.
With the publication of the Presidential Circular No. 2026/9 dated August 17, 2026, in the Official Gazette No. 33344 dated August 18, 2026, the Türkiye Artificial Intelligence Action Plan (2026–2030) has entered its implementation phase.
In its current form, the Action Plan does not impose any direct and general binding obligations on the private sector. However, the new legal and technical framework envisaged by the Plan is expected to result in concrete compliance implications for companies in the subsequent stages.
The Action Plan consists of 16 priority actions under four main pillars titled "Recognize, Leverage, Produce, Govern."
This approach demonstrates that artificial intelligence is being addressed not merely as a technology investment, but as a holistic ecosystem encompassing data, infrastructure, human resources, financing, security, and regulation.
One of the most notable aspects of the Plan from the private sector perspective is the national legal and ethical framework for artificial intelligence envisaged under Action 4.
Under the proposed approach, AI systems are intended to be subject to different obligations based on their level of risk. In this context, the following mechanisms are envisaged to be standardized:
Companies that develop AI models or use third-party AI services would be well advised to review their existing data processing inventories so that they also cover AI use cases.
The Plan envisages the standardization of technical documentation for high-impact AI systems.
Companies may find it beneficial to consider the following preparations at this stage:
In the period ahead, the secondary legislation and sector-specific guidelines expected to be issued under the Action Plan will shape the main compliance agenda for companies. In particular, organizations that use or develop high-impact AI systems should closely monitor these developments.
You may access the relevant announcement here. (In Turkish)
Kategori Personal Data Protection Law
Notification!
The content in this article is for general information purposes only and belongs to CottGroup® member companies. This content does not constitute legal, financial, or technical advice and cannot be quoted without proper attribution.
CottGroup® member companies do not guarantee that the information in the article is accurate, up-to-date, or complete and are not liable for any damages that may arise from errors, omissions, or misunderstandings that the information may contain.
The information presented here is intended to provide a general overview. Each specific case may require different assessments, and this information may not be applicable to every situation. Therefore, before taking any action based on the information provided in the article, it is strongly recommended that you consult a competent professional in the relevant fields such as legal, financial, technical, and other areas of expertise. If you are a CottGroup® client, do not forget to contact your client representative regarding your specific situation. If you are not our client, please seek advice from an appropriate expert.
To reach CottGroup® member companies, click here.
About The Author
https://www.cottgroup.com
The KVKK's Public Announcement on the Processing of Biometric Data for Attendance Tracking Purposes: The Scope of the Principle Decision and the Limits of Application
Ezgi Anasız
1 Eylül 2026
Türkiye's National Artificial Intelligence Action Plan 2026–2030: A New Era for the Private Sector
Selma Kıy
21 Ağustos 2026
Five-Year Retention of Employee Emails and Conditions for Access: The Garante's Decision