Mevzuat Kategorileri
Hukuksal Düzenlemeler
Türkiye’de Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Kanunu, Sosyal Güvenlik Hukuku, Vergi Hukuku, İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Mevzuatı, Borçlar Hukuku, İş Hukuku, Ticaret Hukuku, Türk Parası Kıymetini Koruma Mevzuatı, Kambiyo Mevzuatı ve Vatandaşlık ve Göçmenlik Mevzuatı ile ilgili en güncel bilgilerin yer aldığı makalelere buradan ulaşabilirsiniz.
İkili Anlaşmalar
Türkiye ve diğer ülkeler arasında yapılan en güncel uluslararası ikili sosyal güvenlik ve vergi anlaşmalarının tarihlerine ve dokümanlarına buradan ulaşabilirsiniz.
In the concrete case, which is subject of the decision of the 12th Criminal Department of the Court of Appeal with Basic 2020/1413, Dated November 17, 2021 and Decision numbered 2021/8051,it has been determined that the employee who lost his life due to a work accident worked as an electrician in the electrical work included in the dangerous work class, but he did not have a diploma or vocational education document related to electrical work. Since this situation is prohibited in the Occupational Health and Safety Law and the employer does not fulfill its obligations listed in Occupational Health and Safety Law, the Court of Appeal decided that the crime of killing by gross negligence was committed against employee.
In the Occupational Health and Safety Law (in Turkish) ("Law"), some jobs are separated from others and classified as dangerous and very dangerous jobs. The main reason for this distinction is to keep the employer's supervision and control obligation at the highest level and the minimize both the degree of damage and the number of work accidents that may occur with it.
The Law has brought more than one obligation to the employer to ensure the safety of life and property of the employee. Some of them as follows;
The obligation, which is the basis of this decision of the Court of Appeal and which is violated by the employer, is regulated in the Article 17/3 of the Law. "Those who do not certify that they have received vocational training cannot be employed in the dangerous and very dangerous jobs that require vocational training." The legislator clearly protected the employee who works in dangerous and very dangerous jobs and brought the employer to control the requirement process. As in the concrete case, the employer who does not fulfill its inspection obligation will be the most reasonable party in the case of work accident.
In addition to these obligations for which the employer is responsible, the Law also imposes an obligation on the employee to comply with the instructions of the employer. According to the art. 19 of the Law; "Employees are obliged not to endanger the health and safety of themselves, and other employees affected by their actions or work, in line with the training they receive regarding occupational health and safety and the employer's instructions this matter."
Considering the obligations of both the employee and the employer, the Court of Appeal has included the following statements in the Decision;
It should be noted that these obligations imposed on the employer within the scope of the Occupational Health and Safety Law and all relevant legislation are brought to prevent work accidents and that employers should not employ persons who cannot certify their professional competence in dangerous and very dangerous jobs.
Should you have any queries or need further details, please contact your customer representative.
Kategori Occupational Health and Safety Law
Notification!
The content in this article is for general information purposes only and belongs to CottGroup® member companies. This content does not constitute legal, financial, or technical advice and cannot be quoted without proper attribution.
CottGroup® member companies do not guarantee that the information in the article is accurate, up-to-date, or complete and are not liable for any damages that may arise from errors, omissions, or misunderstandings that the information may contain.
The information presented here is intended to provide a general overview. Each specific case may require different assessments, and this information may not be applicable to every situation. Therefore, before taking any action based on the information provided in the article, it is strongly recommended that you consult a competent professional in the relevant fields such as legal, financial, technical, and other areas of expertise. If you are a CottGroup® client, do not forget to contact your client representative regarding your specific situation. If you are not our client, please seek advice from an appropriate expert.
To reach CottGroup® member companies, click here.
About The Author
https://www.cottgroup.com
New OHS Training Regulation Published: Key Changes Awaiting Workplaces
Ümit Kır
2 Nisan 2026
Amendments Made to the Regulation on Occupational Health and Safety Training
5 Mart 2025
New Regulations Regarding Collection of Rent Payments for Housing and Workplaces
Selma Kıy
18 Ekim 2024